X.org calls for the removal of the of the entire FSF BoD
Shawn Starr
shawn.starr at rogers.com
Thu Mar 25 01:29:34 UTC 2021
On 3/24/21 8:47 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:02:05AM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 20:49 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> "... and defend a free and open accelerated graphics stack."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Defense is generally something that's done towards the outside of our
>>>
>>> own community, for example by clearly distancing us from the actions
>>>
>>> of the oldest free software foundation there is when they end up
>>>
>>> dragging the entire free software world into a rather bad light
>>>
>>> through that.
>>
>>
>> I am strongly against this open letter, I think you have completely
>> missed the point of the values that the X.org and freedesktop.org
>> communities are based on.
>
> Out of interest: what are those values?
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
> _______
It's become apparent after seeing the original poster of this thread's
twitter account. That I would like X.org to refrain from politics and
focus on code, just code. Not venture into what people decide is
acceptable views and behaviors.
It is unacceptable for X.org to go after people that is not what Open
Source is. We are not some political movement.
My values are to spreading X/Wayland to more people to use, contribute.
How they do so and what their political views, beliefs are none of my
business and is NOT the business of Open Source.
We are to encourage people to participate, being polite, not bashing
their views however correct or incorrect they are.
Thanks,
Shawn.
________________________________________
> members at foundation.x.org: X.Org Foundation Members
> Archives: https://foundation.x.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/members
> Info: https://foundation.x.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/members
>
More information about the members
mailing list