libv at skynet.be
Thu Apr 28 12:48:52 UTC 2016
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:07:03PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 04/27/16 02:34 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:07:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>Jeremy Reed asked the same thing in the question time, and we answered
> >>that there. Should indeed have updated the vote question, but personally
> >>feels fishy to do this 1 day before closing. Unfortunately too late :(
> >"too late, too bad" is not what people want to hear when talking about a
> >supposed democratic process.
> A democratic process does not change the election schedule for everybody
> when one voter is unhappy - no national election would ever complete then.
> Democracy gives every person a vote, not a veto.
A veto is quite the logical leap. And it's a few in 60, of which one
has spoken up.
More information about the members